Our Latest News
EARLY BIRD DISCOUNT ENDS TODAY!! LAST CHANCE TO SAVE £50 PER DELEGATE
EARLY BIRD DISCOUNT ENDS TODAY!!
Hr NETWORK ‘TRANSFORMATION THROUGH PEOPLE & TECHNOLOGY’ Conference & Exhibition 2026
The Hr NETWORK National Conference & Exhibition will take place on Wednesday 13th May 2026 at the home of Scottish Rugby, the magnificent BT Murrayfield Stadium.
Following a hugely successful Conference & Exhibition in May 2025, followed by the incredible reaction from sponsors & guests at our recent Hr NETWORK National Awards Gala Dinner at the Hilton Glasgow on 13th November 2025, we are delighted to announce details for the forthcoming and hugely anticipated annual Hr NETWORK’ TRANSFORMATION THROUGH PEOPLE & TECHNOLOGY ’ Conference & Exhibition 2026.
This is your LAST CHANCE to SAVE £50 – EARLY BIRD DISCOUNT ENDS TODAY 28th February: £165+VAT
Please note from 1st March, the cost per delegate will increase to £215+VAT – The delegate booking form will be OPEN until Friday 8th May 2026.
UK organisations could unlock £40bn a year in productivity value by closing the AI ‘Grey Zone’
UK organisations could unlock £40bn a year in productivity value by closing the AI ‘Grey Zone’

New research from Zellis reveals that UK organisations could unlock £40 billion a year in productivity gains, and a further £20 billion a year in operating-cost savings through better AI alignment between leaders and employees. The findings are published today in The Grey Zone: The Untapped Advantage of AI Alignment.
The report uncovers the considerable gap between how leaders believe AI is used and how employees experience it day-to-day. Zellis describes this area of misalignment as an AI “grey zone”, where adoption is widespread but impact, confidence and usage is uneven.
The research found that:
- 94% of business leaders surveyed say their organisation uses AI tools, but only 61% of employees say they use AI in their role.
- Employees are far more likely to want AI applied to routine, administrative tasks: 69%saying basic data entry and checking should be AI-led, compared with 44% of leaders.
- Leaders are more likely to want AI used in higher-stakes decisions: 35%of leaders believe promotions and pay decisions should be AI‑led, compared with only 8% of employees.
- 63% of leaders whose organisations use AI say they involve employees or teams in decisions around its use – but only 40% of employees using AI agree they feel involved, and a third (33%) disagree that they’re involved.
Better AI alignment, adoption and integration in the workplace represents an immense, untapped productivity and cost-saving opportunity.
Both leaders and teams recognise this: three-quarters of employees (75%) and leaders (74%) believe productivity would improve if AI were better aligned with how work is actually done. Both groups estimate that around 8% of working time could be redirected to higher-value activities through more effective AI alignment. Applied across large organisations in the UK, this equates up to an estimated 1.7 billion working hours a year, potentially worth around £40 billion in redeployable staff time.
The opportunity goes even further. Leaders estimate that improved alignment could unlock a further £20 billion in potential operating-cost savings. In fact, one in five (20%) leaders say that better use of AI could cut operating costs by 7-10%, freeing up to £1 in every £10 to reinvest elsewhere.
“This research shows just how big the AI opportunity really is. When better alignment on AI could unlock up to £60 billion a year for UK organisations, leaving that value unrealised isn’t an option,” said Abigail Vaughan, CEO of Zellis. “The data makes clear this isn’t just about AI adoption, but about making sure AI is implemented with transparency and collaboration, and in ways that genuinely support how people experience work to reach their potential.”
Across the UK and Ireland AI is increasingly seen as integral to the workplace.
- A third (34%) of employees said they expect their employer to provide access to AI tools that will help them do their job more effectively within the next year, rising to nearly two-thirds (63%) within the next two years.
- Almost half of leaders (47%)say advanced digital and AI skills will be required in their organisation within the next year, rising to more than three-quarters (77%) within the next two years.
- 74% of leaders say employee up-skilling will become increasingly important over the next two years.
Furthermore, the way leaders handle AI also has a direct impact on employee retention, morale and wellbeing.
- Two in five employees (40%) say transparent use of AI would make them more likely to stay with their employer, while a similar proportion (42%)say it would improve trust in leadership.
- 51%of employees and 59% of leaders who use AI agreed AI reduces work-related stress, rising to 62% among employees aged 18-34.
- Three in five (61%)employees aged 18-34, who use AI, agreed it has helped them be more confident in their role.
- Younger employees are more open to AI leadership and engagement, with 58%agreeing that their feedback on AI use is valued and acted upon, compared to much lower confidence across the wider workforce, where only 45% believe senior leaders are using AI effectively, and just 40% feel involved in decisions about how it is used.
These changing expectations around AI are being shaped by its current use. Millennials and Gen Y are currently the most active users with (69%) of those aged 29-44 using AI at work and 27% doing so regularly. As this generation becomes the backbone of the workforce, and future leadership, their patterns of use are setting the standard for what “normal” looks like at work.
“As AI becomes a baseline expectation for performance, progression and job satisfaction, organisations that fail to provide the right AI tools and training risk losing the best talent and falling behind competitors.” said Steve Elcock, Director of Product – AI, Zellis. “AI doesn’t fail because the technology isn’t ready; it fails when people aren’t. Our findings show employees are enthusiastic about AI when it’s used to remove friction from everyday work, but more cautious when it’s positioned as the decision-maker in higher stakes areas like pay and progression. That isn’t resistance to AI, it’s about education and trust. When organisations are clear that AI is there to inform judgement rather than replace it, confidence grows, capability follows and value is unlocked. Alignment turns AI from a source of uncertainty into a catalyst for better decisions, better work and more resilient workplace cultures.”
“The findings show a clear advantage for organisations that focus on AI alignment, not just adoption. By embedding AI across HR, pay, WFM and benefits in ways that support people and build trust, employers can improve the speed and quality of their work and create stronger workplace cultures – an approach Zellis helps organisations to deliver,” said Vaughan. “When leaders involve their people, communicate clearly and use AI to inform rather than replace human judgement, organisations can elevate their work and empower employees to be their best. There’s huge value to be gained through AI when attention is paid to alignment.”
The report includes comparative charts highlighting where leaders and employees diverge most on AI use, alongside visuals showing how the time and cost savings have been calculated from the survey data.
One in five UK workers failing to take annual leave allowance due to workplace pressure
One in five UK workers failing to take annual leave allowance due to workplace pressure
New research suggests millions of workers are failing to take the annual leave they are entitled to, and paying the price with rising stress and burnout. In the study of 6,000 UK employees, staff leave management platform Timetastic has revealed that more than one in five workers (21%) do not take their full annual leave allowance, despite overwhelming evidence that time off improves wellbeing and reduces stress.
According to the findings, published as part of The 2026 Annual Leave Report, nearly nine in ten respondents (89%) said that taking a holiday improves their mental health, yet more than one in nine (11%) admitted they feel pressure not to book time off, citing workload concerns and guilt as the main barriers. As a consequence, almost half (45%) said their mental health suffered, while 100% reported higher levels of work-related stress.
Despite ongoing conversations around wellbeing and work–life balance, only 18% of employees finished the year with no remaining allowance, and more than a quarter (26%) had over 15 days left unused – the equivalent of two full working weeks of rest.
Age and seniority also played a role. Younger workers aged 18–24 were the most likely to take their full entitlement (82%), while older age groups were more inclined to leave days unused. Mid-level managers and supervisors reported the highest levels of pressure to skip holidays, with over a quarter (26%) saying they felt unable to fully step away. In contrast, just 1% of senior management reported feeling the same pressure.
Sarah Crammond at Timetastic, explains: “While senior leaders may have more control over their schedules, those entering the workforce today are navigating a culture where ‘always-on’ availability is often mistaken for commitment. It suggests that while younger workers value their wellbeing, they may still feel the weight of traditional work ethics that prioritise ‘grind’ over recovery.”
The research also highlights how deeply ingrained guilt around time off has become. 9% of employees said they feel guilty simply for taking their earned leave, while a further 42% said their decision to take time off is influenced by workload pressure, workplace culture or concerns about inconveniencing colleagues.
“Efficient annual leave isn’t just about ticking boxes,” Crammond added. “It’s about creating breathing room for your team. When managers have clear visibility of who is off and when, they can distribute workloads more fairly, ensuring that no one feels like their holiday is an inconvenience to the business.
“It’s vital for managers to remember that they can’t pour from an empty cup. When a leader is stressed and skipping breaks, that tension filters down, creating a culture where the rest of the team feels guilty for resting,” explains Crammond.
“To lead effectively, you have to reset. A rested manager makes better decisions, is more empathetic, and sets a healthy permission-based culture for everyone else.”
Bottled water giants’ HRD to deliver keynote session at #HrNC26 in May
Bottled water giants’ HRD to deliver keynote session at #HrNC26 in May

Hr NETWORK is delighted to announce that one of the SIX keynote sessions at our ‘TRANSFORMATION THROUGH PEOPLE & TECHNOLOGY’ themed Conference & Exhibition in Edinburgh on Wednesday 13th May will be delivered by Highland Spring Group’s HR Director, John Jarvie.
Highland Spring is the UK’s number one bottled water brand, where over the past four years, the business has grown sales year on year and doubled profit — proving that culture building, when done well, can be a powerful commercial engine. Entitled: ‘Why Culture-Building is Hard Work – and why it’s worth it‘, John will share mistakes made and lessons-learned along the way and why the effort is worth it.
Also delivering Keynote sessions on the day:
-
Kat Gray, Director of Talent & Culture, ASOS
Session Title: Fashioning a Culture for the Future -
Gary Crawford, Chief Advisor/Partner & Rebecca Hastings, Partner, Owendale Advisory – Session Title: How HR Makes – Or Breaks – AI Success
-
Lorraine Mills, Principal Consultant, Right Management – Session Title: To be confirmed
-
Senior HR Leaders Forum Panel – (Panellists to be confirmed)
The Hr NETWORK National Conference & Exhibition will take place on Wednesday 13th May 2026 at the home of Scottish Rugby, the magnificent Murrayfield Stadium.

The delegate booking form for 2026 is NOW OPEN and this is your chance to SAVE £50 on each delegate booking between now and Saturday 28th February 2026 – EARLY BIRD DELEGATE COST: £165+VAT
Please note when the EARLY BIRD booking expires on 28th February, the cost per delegate will increase to £215+VAT.
Employers underestimating impact of Employment Rights Act reforms
Employers underestimating impact of Employment Rights Act reforms

As organisations prepare for the first wave of the single biggest set of changes in employment law in decades, new data from Brightmine reveals that, while HR teams recognise the scale of the reforms required by the Employment Rights Act, many are underestimating the breadth of measures that will reshape the employment landscape.
The majority of surveyed HR professionals (60%) believe that changes to unfair dismissal rules will have the greatest effect on their organisation. However, other substantial reforms taking effect from late 2026, including restrictions on fire and rehire practices, new third-party harassment duties, and enhanced union access rights, will also create major operational, legal and financial implications for employers.
Key areas HR professionals anticipate will impact their organisations:
-
-
60% say unfair dismissal changes will have the biggest impact
-
Statutory sick pay changes concern almost a fifth (18%) of respondents
-
9% point to new trade union rights
-
6% highlight third-party harassment liability
-
4% say fire and rehire reforms will have the greatest effect
-
Stephen Simpson at Brightmine says: “As we move closer to implementation of the Employment Rights Act, HR teams are right to flag unfair dismissal as a major area of change. The reduction of the qualifying period to six months and the removal of the cap on unfair dismissal compensation will significantly increase litigation risk and settlement expectations.
But u
nfair dismissal is only part of the picture. From October 2026, employers will also face stricter limits on fire and rehire, making it automatically unfair to dismiss employees who refuse certain contractual changes. At the same time, new third-party harassment duties will require employers to take all reasonable steps to protect employees from harassment.
Add to this the introduction of union access rights which allows unions to require physical or virtual access to workplaces even where employees are not unionised, the combined effect is that employers will have much less room for manoeuvre than they currently have. These overlapping reforms will reshape day to day HR practice, increase the risk of getting decisions wrong and will require significant preparation throughout 2026.
The key message is clear, employers cannot wait until late 2026 to act. HR teams should be reviewing dismissal procedures, assessing contractual flexibility, strengthening harassment prevention measures, and planning for increased union engagement now. Those who delay risk significant legal and financial consequences.”
The Apprenticeship Revival and the Employers Getting It Right
The Apprenticeship Revival and the Employers Getting It Right
The government has announced a £725m overhaul of skills funding, promising 50,000 extra apprenticeship places in an effort to reverse a decade-long slump that has seen the number of young people starting apprenticeships fall by nearly 40%.
With apprenticeship opportunities expanding, a ranking of the UK’s top apprenticeship employers, compiled in a landmark collaboration between the Department for Education and early careers platform Higherin, places Mitchells & Butlers at the top, outperforming tech giant Amazon and defence contractor BAE Systems.
Oliver Sidwell, career expert and Co-Founder of Higherin , argues: “Apprenticeships today are not what they were twenty years ago. They are no longer seen simply as entry-level training for lower-paid work. Today, apprenticeships exist in fields from software engineering to advanced manufacturing, combining rigorous academic learning with hands-on experience,” he explains.
Part of championing these opportunities means benchmarking the very best through Higherin’s annual ranking of the top apprenticeship employers. “We collect honest reviews from apprentices nationwide to identify employers that truly invest in their people,” he highlights.
Why hospitality outpaces traditional powerhouses
Mitchells & Butlers’ victory reflects the sector’s transformation to a sophisticated training provider. The hospitality group, which operates household names including Toby Carvery, Miller & Carter, and All Bar One, achieved an exceptional 98% apprentice satisfaction rating. The company’s approach centres on what they call “progressive responsibility”. Apprentices take on meaningful roles from day one, with structured pathways that can lead to general management within 3-4 years.

Defence giant BAE Systems proves engineering appeal
BAE Systems’ second-place finish demonstrates the continued strength of engineering apprenticeships, particularly in high-tech manufacturing. Operating across 40 countries, the company offers apprentices exposure to cutting-edge projects from fighter jets to cybersecurity systems.
The company’s apprenticeship-to-engineer pipeline has become increasingly attractive as university costs soar, with many programs offering degree-level qualifications alongside hands-on experience.
Amazon’s apprenticeships bypass traditional tech recruiting
Amazon’s third-place ranking reflects the tech giant’s serious investment in alternatives to computer science degrees. Their apprenticeship programs span software development, cloud computing, and data analysis, all of which are traditionally degree-only territories.
How rankings were awarded – real feedback, real impact
The rankings were determined using five key factors that measure both apprenticeship quality and employer commitment:
-
Amount: Total number of apprenticeship opportunities and levels offered by the employer
-
Started: Total number of apprentices that started their apprenticeship this year
-
Completed: Number of apprentices who successfully achieved their apprenticeship this year
-
Diversity: Diversity of the apprenticeship cohort
-
Reviews: Quality and number of reviews submitted by apprentices
Top Ten Employers for Apprentices:

The rankings go beyond simple satisfaction scores, assessing employers on the scale of opportunities they offer, completion rates, and the diversity of their apprentices. By combining hard metrics with the voices of apprentices themselves, the methodology highlights organisations that are genuinely committed to developing young talent.
What do students really want?
Analysis reveals clear patterns in top-performing employers:
Winners focus on:
-
Structured progression pathways with clear milestones
-
Meaningful work from day one, not just observation
-
Strong mentor relationships with dedicated time
-
Mix of formal qualifications and practical skills
-
Cross-department exposure and networking
Common failures:
-
Using apprentices as cheap labour without genuine development
-
Inadequate mentor training and support
-
Unclear progression routes beyond initial qualification
-
Isolation from broader company culture and opportunities
Advice for Prospective Apprentices
Oliver recommends focusing on employers that score highly on development factors rather than just brand recognition: “The best apprenticeship is one where you’ll gain skills employers actually want, with clear paths to progress. The highest-rated employers understand this and create schemes where apprentices gain genuine business experience alongside their qualifications.”
For employers, the message emphasises genuine investment over marketing promises: “Apprentices are hugely motivated. They research thoroughly and share experiences widely. Companies that treat apprenticeships as strategic talent development will attract the best candidates. Those who see them as cheap labour will struggle.”
